he Court held that the school district did not procedurally violate the IDEA when it found the student eligible under specific learning disa

Student contends that Fremont should have suspected Student had a specific learning disability.

BEFORE THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS STATE OF CALIFORNIA PARENTS ON BEHALF OF STUDENT, v. PIEDMONT UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT. CASE...

BEFORE THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO. 2022060225 PARENT ON BEHALF OF STUDENT, v. SAN DIEGUITO UNION...

BEFORE THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO. 2022050292 CASE NO. 2022010218 THE CONSOLIDATED MATTERS...

BEFORE THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS STATE OF CALIFORNIA PARENT ON BEHALF OF STUDENT, v. CHINO VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT...

United States District Court, Central District of California. A.P. et al. v. PASADENA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Case No. CV 19-7965-MWF...

BEFORE THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO. 2020080333 DECISION PARENT ON BEHALF OF STUDENT, v. OAKLAND...

OAH BEFORE THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS STATE OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO. 2019101110 PARENT ON BEHALF OF STUDENT v. COMPTON UNIFIED...

Student contends Palos Verdes Peninsula denied him a FAPE from July 17, 2017, through January 16, 2020, by failing to identify, locate, and